🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years building community backing and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.