🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.