🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.